Home › Forums › Patrick Cannon › Can the use of a bare trustee avoid the 3% additional rate of SDLT? › Reply To: Can the use of a bare trustee avoid the 3% additional rate of SDLT?
10th January 2018 at 2:28 pm
#898
Guest
The DoT analysis in paras 49-51 of the recent case in the link below seems to confirm that written “retrospective” DoTs are fine in the absence of fraud, sham, undue influence and mistake.